Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Wed Jul 05 2006 - 18:05:54 EST


On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:00:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > well, the allnoconfig thing is artificial (and the uninteresting) for a
> > > number of reasons:
> >
> > hm, I'd have to say that allyesconfig is also artificial and the
> > savings numbers are somewhat uninteresting in that case too.
>
> well the 'allyesconfig' isnt the true allyesconfig but one with most
> debugging options disabled. It is quite close to a typical distro config
> - hence very much relevant. (I wanted to use something that is easy to
> reproduce.) Believe me, for large configs the savings are real.

I would expect distros to use something close to all*mod*config
(with some debug options disabled).

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/