Re: [KJ] [PATCH] fix legacy megaraid-driver to compile withoutCONFIG_PROC_FS

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:33:49 +0200 Henne wrote:

> >> From: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Create an empty inline function to make the legacy megaraid-driver compile
> >> without PROC_FS.
> >> Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h    2006-06-18 03:49:35.000000000 +0200
> >> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h       2006-07-06 21:39:59.000000000 +0200
> >> @@ -1039,6 +1039,9 @@
> >>  static int proc_rdrv_30(char *, char **, off_t, int, int *, void *);
> >>  static int proc_rdrv_40(char *, char **, off_t, int, int *, void *);
> >>  static int proc_rdrv(adapter_t *, char *, int, int);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void
> >> +mega_create_proc_entry(int index, struct proc_dir_entry *parent) {}
> >>  #endif
> >>
> >>  static int mega_adapinq(adapter_t *, dma_addr_t);
> > 
> > Already in -mm:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm6/broken-out/drivers-scsi-megaraidc-add-a-dummy-mega_create_proc_entry-for-proc_fs=y.patch
> Great, but isn't it better to put that define stuff into the headers?

Sure it is.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/