Re: ACPIPNP and too large IO resources

From: Shaohua Li
Date: Thu Jul 06 2006 - 21:04:35 EST


On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:29 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 16:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > You recently proposed pushing it:
> > >
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=115119275408021&w=2
> > > Len initially nacked it, but I think the outcome of the
> discussion
> > > is that Shaohua doesn't object to this patch. He probably would
> > > still like to blacklist PNP0A03, but that's an additional step we
> > > don't have to take at the same time.
> >
> > OK, well let's please push this up the priority list and work out
> what want
> > to do. If Len's now OK with merging it then I think all lights are
> green?
>
> My opinion is that we don't need to blacklist PNP0A03 unless
> we discover a problem.
>
> Len, Shaohua, can you ack this?
Sure. Please merge the patch Bjorn pointed out.

Thanks,
Shaohua

>
> > pnpacpi-reject-acpi_producer-resources.patch:
> >
> > From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > A patch in -mm kernel correct the parsing of "address resources" of
> pnpacpi.
> > Before we assumed it was memory only, but it could be also IO.
> >
> > But this change show an hidden bug : some resources could be
> producer type
> > that are not handled by pnp layer. So we should ignore the
> producer
> > resources.
> >
> > This patch fixes bug 6292
> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6292).
> > Some devices like PNP0A03 have 0xd00-0xffff and 0x0-0xcf7 as IO
> producer
> > resources.
> >
> > Before correcting "address resources" parsing, it was seen as memory
> and was
> > harmless, because nobody tried to reserve this memory range as it
> should be
> > IO.
> >
> > With the correction it become IO resources, and make failed all
> others device
> > that want to register IO in this range and use pnp layer (like a ISA
> sound
> > card).
> >
> > The solution is to ignore producer resources
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > akpm: previously nacked, as per comment #26. But am hanging onto it
> until the
> > thing gets fixed for real.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff -puN
> drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c~pnpacpi-reject-acpi_producer-resources
> drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
> > ---
> a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c~pnpacpi-reject-acpi_producer-resources
> > +++ a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
> > @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ pnpacpi_parse_allocated_address_space(st
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + if (p->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (p->resource_type == ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE)
> > pnpacpi_parse_allocated_memresource(res_table,
> > p->minimum, p->address_length);
> > @@ -252,9 +255,14 @@ static acpi_status pnpacpi_allocated_res
> > break;
> >
> > case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS64:
> > + if (res->data.ext_address64.producer_consumer ==
> ACPI_PRODUCER)
> > + return AE_OK;
> > break;
> >
> > case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
> > + if (res->data.extended_irq.producer_consumer ==
> ACPI_PRODUCER)
> > + return AE_OK;
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i <
> res->data.extended_irq.interrupt_count; i++) {
> >
> pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(res_table,
> > res->data.extended_irq.interrupts[i],
> > _
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/