Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stopsignals+SIGCONT

[Arjan van de Ven]

> There must be some framework for changing the kernel ABI over time.
> We can't remain forever stuck with an ABI behaviour because 
> of the development model (i.e., no 2.7/2.8). 

Hi,

this has nothing to do with the development model. The userspace syscall
ABI *has* to be stable. If we make a mistake that's a high price but we
pay it. This fwiw is one of the reasons we are/should be very careful
with adding system calls, and make sure the behavior is indeed right.
It's also the reason we're not so happy about new ioctls; they're
effectively mini-system calls with the same ABI issues, but just less
controlled/reviewed/designed/visible.

Greetings,
  Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/