Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 07-07-06 19:44:24, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0200, grundig wrote:
> > You may ask "why not merge suspend2", but from an objective
> > POV it's perfectly fine that some people asks "why don't
> > suspend2 people try to improve swsusp instead of rewritting
> > it? It may be easier to fix swsusp than replacint it with
> > suspend2"
> 
> Suspend2 is an improvement on swsusp.  What Pavel wants is something
> completely different and even less tested that suspend2 called
> uswsusp.

...which is already merged in 2.6.17, BTW. So what Pavel wants can be
translated as 'please use already merged code, it can already do what
you want without further changing kernel'.

							Pavel
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/