Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Frankly, I'd rather be working on improving drivers and helping implement
> > > the run-time power management than working on getting Suspend2 merged.
...
> Developmentwise, I think it's finished - unless I want to go off in a new 

I'd say that suspend2 already done its job -- forced me to do
uswsusp. I do not think it is mergeable without major refactoring.

Helping with runtime power management would be more welcome than
resubmitting same code over and over. Good news is that you can now do
what you prefer :-).

> > As far as the support for ordinary files, swap files, etc. is concerned,
> > there's nothing to worry about.  It's comming.
> 
> Great. It will be good to see that. Do you have some way around bmapping the 
> files?

You mean "some way to go without bmapping" or "did you get bmapping to
work" ?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/