Re: INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 18:25 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
> 2.6.17-mm6 produces the following warning, but appears to be working perfectly fine.
> 
> 
> Cheers,

Another private skb queue.. I'm starting to think that the patch below
is going to be needed... Ingo ?


Arne: Can you try this patch and verify it makes the message go away?

---
 include/linux/skbuff.h |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.17-mm6/include/linux/skbuff.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-mm6.orig/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ linux-2.6.17-mm6/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -609,7 +609,6 @@ extern struct lock_class_key skb_queue_l
 static inline void skb_queue_head_init(struct sk_buff_head *list)
 {
 	spin_lock_init(&list->lock);
-	lockdep_set_class(&list->lock, &skb_queue_lock_key);
 	list->prev = list->next = (struct sk_buff *)list;
 	list->qlen = 0;
 }


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/