Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 08 July 2006 21:48, Sunil Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Now there seem to be two possible ways to go:
> > 1) Drop the implementation that already is in the kernel and replace it
> > with
> > the out-of-the-tree one.
> > 2) Improve the one that already is in the kernel incrementally, possibly
> > merging some code from the out-of-the-tree implementation, so that it's as
> > feature-rich as the other one.
> >
> > Apparently 1) is what Nigel is trying to make happen and 2) is what I'd
> > like
> > to do.
> 
> Is that really true, Nigel, that you want 1)?
> 
> Is it really impossible to have the third possbility of both the
> implementations in kernel at the same time?

Well, I'm not totally against that, at least as far as -mm is concerned,
but I meant "in the long run".

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/