Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > > It's only too slow on swsusp. With Suspend2, I regularly suspend 1GB
> > > > images on both my desktop and laptop machines. I agree that it might be
> > > > slower on a
> >
> > uswsusp is as fast as suspend2. It does same LZF compression.
> 
> I agree for uncompressed images - I tried timing the writing of the image 
> yesterday. I'm not sure about LZF though, because I couldn't get it to 
> resume. I'd be interested to see it really be as fast as suspend2 with 
> compression.

Is there any way to help you? I assume normal swsusp resumes okay so
it is not driver problem?

> > Do you think you could get some repeatable benchmark for Rafael? He
> > worked quite hard on feature only to find out it makes little difference...
> 
> Sure, but it will mean more if all of the tests are run on the same system, so 
> I'll have another go at getting uswsusp to resume, when I get the chance.

Thanks.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/