RE: Commenting out out_of_memory() function in __alloc_pages()

[Abu M. Muttalib]

Hi,

>>
>> I tried with the /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory=2 and the system refused
to
>> load the program altogether.
>>
>> In this scenario is making overcommit_memory=2 a good idea?
>
>(Good mailing list practices ask you not to top-post - that is, make your
>reply text follow the text you are replying other than appearing before it,
>as I demonstrate here:)
>
Hope this time round I am following the std practice. :-)
>
>Well, how much memory do you have? Does the application actually need more
>memory than your system can provide? If this is the case, there isn't going
>to be any fix except add more memory. Your choices are:
>
>1. Let the OOM killer sacrifice processes because you don't have enough
memory
>2. Disable VM overcommit so that the OOM killer doesn't get engaged
(rather,
>the application's attempt to grab the memory will fail)
>3. Add more memory, don't mess with the overcommit sysctl, and watch things
>work nicely :P

>Are you sure it's not a memory leak? Does the application work on a freshly
>booted system?

I have a total of 16 MB RAM. My main concern is that I was running the same
set of applications earlier on linux-2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1 and didn't get any out
of memory. I am running the same application and get the OOM, though the
appearance is not uniform, at times it comes on a freshly booted system and
at times it didn't come when the system is on overnight.... Why I am getting
here??? Is there any problem with linux-2.6.13?

I have tried to check the application for memory leak with no success. There
seems to be no memory leak.

>Thanks,
>Chase

Regards,
Abu.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/