Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

[Matthew Garrett]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Now there seem to be two possible ways to go:
> 1) Drop the implementation that already is in the kernel and replace it with
> the out-of-the-tree one.

This would break existing interfaces to some extent, right? suspend2 
doesn't have the same set of tunables. I'm not sure whether this is 
something we especially care about, but it would potentially break some 
existing userland code.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/