Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Jul 11 2006 - 03:02:51 EST
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:57:35 -0600
ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:38:59 -0600
> > ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >
> >> Since sys_sysctl is deprecated start allow it to be compiled out.
> >
> > This could be a tough one to get rid of (looks at sys_bdflush() again).
> >
> > I'd suggest we put a sys_bdflush()-style warning in there, see what that
> > flushes out.
>
> Sounds sane. I know I have booted several kernels with it compiled out
> but just because you can do without it doesn't mean that something
> isn't using it.
>
> Hmm. The question is where do I want the put the warning message?
>
> When the code is compiled out?
> When the code is compiled in?
Both. We want to find out who is using it.
> Probably both places at this point, and using the rate limited printk
> I think instead of just the 5 printks that sys_bdflush uses...
No, I think five is enough. If something's using sys_sysctl() then it
might be using it a lot - there's no point in irritating people over it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/