Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n

[andrea]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And it was you who said just a few days ago [1]:
> 
> <--  snip  -->
> 
> ...
> If I've to keep reading these threads about CONFIG_SECCOMP every few
> months then set it to N (even if I disagree with that setting). Like
> Alan said, what really matters is what distro will choose in their
> config, not the default (and I doubt fedora ships with cifs=Y like the
> default where only the required stuff is set to Y, please focus on the
> big stuff first ;).
> 
> <--  snip  -->

The above was in the context of the mainline kernel in case you didn't
notice (when I wrote the above I expected fedora to set it to Y even if
the main kernel was set to N, imagine how way off I was when I wrote the
above ;).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/