[PATCH] [ACPI] Fix section for CPU init functions

From: Pierre Ossman
Date: Wed Jul 12 2006 - 05:08:18 EST


The ACPI processor init functions should be marked as __cpuinit as they
use structures marked with __cpuinitdata.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@xxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index b13d644..1908e0d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ #endif

static void *processor_device_array[NR_CPUS];

-static int acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device)
{
int result = 0;
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 7106606..1ecd3a7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static const struct file_operations acpi
.release = single_release,
};

-int acpi_processor_power_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+int __cpuinit acpi_processor_power_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
struct acpi_device *device)
{
acpi_status status = 0;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/