Re: [PATCH] Airprime driver improvements to allow full speed EvDOtransfers

[Sergei Organov]

Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:20:19PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
[...]
>> Besides, if the throttle() is that important and failure to handle it is
>> a big mistake, why is it optional then? I mean why struct tty_operations
>> with throttle field set to NULL is accepted in the first place? The same
>> question is applicable to the struct usb_serial_driver.
>
> Yes, I didn't realize it was required.

That was my point, -- people don't realize it is dangerous not to handle
throttle, and in fact it was not that dangerous before new tty buffering
has been implemented. I do handle throttle in my driver, but it has been
implemented as a part of work-around for the deficiencies of the old tty
buffering. I seriously doubt I'd realize it's a must to honour throttle
should I start to write the driver today.

-- 
Sergei.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/