Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl

[H. Peter Anvin]

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 11:24 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > What is the motivation behind killing the sys_sysctl call anyway?
> > > Sure its more ugly esthetically but it works.
> > it "works" but the thing is that the number space is NOT stable, and as
> > such it's a really bad ABI
>
> To be fair, the older, "base" numbers are actually stable, such as
> what glibc is depending on, have in practice been quite stable.  It's
> only the newer fields that tend to be unstable.
>
> But that means we can afford to do an orderly migration away from it;
> it's not something that has to be urgently done within a few weeks or
> even a few months.

Another alternative would be to publish a limited set of sysctl numbers 
that will be maintained forever.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/