Re: Linux 2.6.17.5

[Miquel van Smoorenburg]

In article <44B90DF1.8070400@xxxxxxxxx>,
Von Wolher  <trilight@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>> 
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> 
>>> I did a slight modification of the patch I committed initially, in the
>>> face of the report from Marcel that the initial sledge-hammer approach
>>> broke his hald setup.
>>>
>>> See commit 9ee8ab9fbf21e6b87ad227cd46c0a4be41ab749b: "Relax /proc fix
>>> a bit", which should still fix the bug (can somebody verify? I'm 100%
>>> sure, but still..), but is pretty much guaranteed to not have any
>>> secondary side effects.
>>>
>>> It still leaves the whole issue of whether /proc should honor chmod AT
>>> ALL open, and I'd love to close that one, but from a "minimal fix"
>>> standpoint, I think it's a reasonable (and simple) patch.
>>>
>>> Marcel, can you check current git?
>> 
>> 
>> I can confirm that the new fix prevents the exploit from working, with
>> no immediately visible side effects.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>> 
>
>Can some one release a 2.6.17.6 ? I think many people are waiting at
>their keyboard to get their systems protected.

# mount -o remount,nosuid /proc

Haven't tested it but that should be the workaround.

Mike.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/