Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.orgregarding reiser4 inclusion

[David Masover]

Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be 
> > very robust against any kind of hardware failures.
>
> Can't have both.

Why not?  I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for 
them being mutually exclusive?  I suspect it's more "we haven't found a 
way yet..."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/