Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true

[Jeff Garzik]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> ricknu-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This patch defines:
> > * a generic boolean-type, named "bool"
> > * aliases to 0 and 1, named "false" and "true"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Shouldn't this simply use _Bool?

No sane person should use "_Bool" in real code.  Unnecessary StudlyCaps 
and unnecessary underscore.

"bool" is far easier to type, and looks less weird.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/