Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true

[Jeff Garzik]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That wasn't the point.  The point was that bool should be a typedef to 
> _Bool instead of an enum.

Quoting from the patch to which you are replying:

	+typedef _Bool			bool;

'enum' is only used for defining 'true' and 'false'.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/