Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true

[Jeff Garzik]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > There is no enum involved.

> > There should be.  It makes more information available to the C 
> > compiler, and it makes useful symbols available to the debugger.

> _Bool is a native C type; it has all the information the C compiler needs.

"#define true 1" however does not.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/