Re: [patch] x86: rename is_at_popf(), add iret to tests and fix insn length

[Andi Kleen]

On Wednesday 02 August 2006 14:37, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> is_at_popf() needs to test for the iret instruction as well as
> popf.  So add that test and rename it to is_setting_trap_flag().

Do you have a single real example where anybody is actually using IRET
in user space? 

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/