Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [1/5] not-aligned memory hotadd handling fix

[Yasunori Goto]

> > After Keith's report of memory hotadd failure, I increased test patterns.
> > These patches are a result of new patterns. But I cannot cover all existing
> > memory layout in the world, more tests are needed.
> > Now, I think my patch can make things better and want this codes to be tested
> > in -mm.patche series is consitsts of 5 patches.
> 
> I expect the code which these patches touch is completely untested in -mm, so
> all we'll get is compile testing and some review.
> 
> Given that these patches touch pretty much nothing but the memory hot-add
> paths I'd be inclined to fast-track them into 2.6.18.  Do you agree that
> these patches are sufficiently safe and that the problems that they solve
> are sufficiently serious for us to take that approach?
> 
> Either way, could I ask that interested parties review this work closely
> and promptly?

Hmm. I reviewed them a bit, and I couldn't find any problems.

However, my ia64 box is same of his. And emulation environment is very
close too. So, my perspective must be very similar from him.
I think my review is not enough. Keith-san's test is better if he can.

Anyway, I'll test them with -mm. Something different environment
may be good for test.

Thanks.


-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/