Re: Userspace visible of 3 include/asm/ headers

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:51:38PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> >
> >On different architectures, we have the following values for 
> >COMMAND_LINE_SIZE:
> >- 256
> >- 512
> >- 896
> >- 1024
> >- 4096
> >
> >What should be the common value?
> >4096?
> >
> >And I have a rough memory of some dependencies of COMMAND_LINE_SIZE and 
> >boot loaders. What exactly must be taken care of when increasing 
> >COMMAND_LINE_SIZE?
> >
> 
> It's architecture-dependent; it probably should be defined in something 
> like <asm/cmdline.h>.

OK, I did misunderstand you.
I tought you were saying it should be the same value for all 
architectures.

With the exception of frv (in param.h), COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is in setup.h 
on all architectures.

Do we want to move it to a different header, or simply make param.h a 
userspace header on all architectures?

> 	-hpa

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/