Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:40:09 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > So my take was "looks good, done deal - let's go get some sane controllers
> > working".  And now this!
> 
> My recollection from the BoF is that people felt interface wasn't a major
> issue and it wasn't discussed much. Most of the discussion centered
> around grouping of tasks and the mem/cpu controllers and some additional
> resource control requirements from openvz folks.

OK.  That's certainly the area to be concentrating on.

> One way to go forward with the interface could be to request Chandra
> to repost the ckrm infrastructure and see if the stake holders (primarily
> container folks) can review and agree on it.

Fine.  But let's separate that activity from the primary one: worrying
about the controllers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/