Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
From: keith mannthey
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 04:30:00 EST
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:23 +0300, Mika Penttilà wrote:
> keith mannthey wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:48 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:23:46 -0700
> >> keith mannthey <kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> >>>>> What keeps 0xa0000000 to 0xa1000000 from being re-onlined by a bad call
> >>>>> to add_memory?
> >>>>>
> >>>> Usual sparsemem's add_memory() checks whether there are sections in
> >>>> sparse_add_one_section(). then add_pages() returns -EEXIST (nothing to do).
> >>>> And ioresouce collision check will finally find collision because 0-0xbffffff
> >>>> resource will conflict with 0xa0000000 to 0xa10000000 area.
> >>>> But, x86_64 's (not sparsemem) add_pages() doen't do collision check, so it panics.
> >>>>
> >>> I have paniced with your 5 patches while doing SPARSMEM.... I think
> >>> your 6th patch address the issues I was seeing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > with the 6 patches things work as expected. It is nice to have the
> > sysfs devices online the correct amount of memory.
> >
> > I was broken without this patch because invalid add_memory calls are
> > made on by box (yet another issue) during boot.
> >
> > I will build my patch set on top of your 6 patches.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Keith
> >
> >
> Keith, are you working on the reserve hotadd case? It looks really
> broken, at the same time we both assume the hot add region contains RAM
> per e820 (use of reserve_bootmem_node()) and at the same time in other
> places (in reserve_hotadd()) that it may not contain RAM. And
> nodes_cover_memory() is broken no matter what we assume.
I am working that right now... There is handful of things that need
cleaned up with RESERVE. I am about 1 patch away for a patchset that
make both SPARSEMEM and RESERVE hot-add work on x86_64. It should be out
soon.
Reserve is in a non-compile state as it stands with 2.6.18.
Thanks,
Keith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/