Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions

[Jeff Dike]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:00:43PM +0000, alessandro salvatori wrote:
>   the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor
> macros to be included from a header file instead of non-static functions in
> the same module as the static irq_lock.

I don't understand.  The changes in this patch are -
	remove two functions and their declarations
	replace calls to those functions with spin_lock_irq_save and
spin_unlock_irqsave
	move the spinlock declaration above the spin_(un)lock_irq_save
calls

Which of these are you talking about?

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/