Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls

[Albert Cahalan]

On 8/7/06, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [Albert Cahalan]
> > Edgar Toernig writes:

> > > Urgs, so any user may remove mappings from another process and
> > > let it crash?
> > Two good solutions come to mind:
> >
> > a. substitute the zero page
> > b. make the mapping private and touch it as if C-O-W happened
>
> Actually, I think revokeat() and frevoke() should be consistent with
> mmap which will make a process go SIGBUS if it attempts to write to
> truncated shared mapping.

You're right. Apps must already be tolerant of SIGBUS.
There is thus no additional risk.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/