ext3 vs reiserfs speed (was Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion))
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Aug 07 2006 - 17:57:41 EST
Hi!
> > Using guilt as an argument in a technical discussion is a flashing red
> > sign that says "I have no technical rebuttal"
>
> Wow, that is really nervy. Let's recap this all:
>
> * reiser4 has a 2x performance advantage over the next fastest FS
> (ext3), and when compression ships in a month that will double again as
> well as save space. See http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html, and
Does that mean that ext3 is faster than reiser3? Wow, that would be
good reason to switch default filesystem to ext3 (or reiser4?) in next
suse release.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/