Re: [PATCH 1/6] ehea: interface to network stack

From: Jan-Bernd Themann
Date: Fri Aug 11 2006 - 07:38:27 EST


Hi Christian,

thanks for your comments, we'll send an updated patch set soon.

Jan-Bernd

Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Hi Jan-Bernd,

I had some minutes, here are some finding after a quick look.

On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:38, you wrote:
+static struct net_device_stats *ehea_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ int i;
+ u64 hret = H_HARDWARE;
+ u64 rx_packets = 0;
+ struct ehea_port *port = (struct ehea_port*)dev->priv;

dev->priv is a void pointer, this cast is unnecessary. When we are at it, have you considered the netdev_priv macro? This will require some prep in alloc_netdev and might not always pe possible.

good point, we'll use alloc_etherdev / netdev_priv

+
+ EDEB_DMP(7, (u8*)cb2,
+ sizeof(struct hcp_query_ehea_port_cb_2), "After HCALL");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < port->num_def_qps; i++) {
+ rx_packets += port->port_res[i].rx_packets;
+ }
+
+ stats->tx_packets = cb2->txucp + cb2->txmcp + cb2->txbcp;
+ stats->multicast = cb2->rxmcp;
+ stats->rx_errors = cb2->rxuerr;
+ stats->rx_bytes = cb2->rxo;
+ stats->tx_bytes = cb2->txo;
+ stats->rx_packets = rx_packets;
+
+get_stat_exit:
+ EDEB_EX(7, "");
+ return stats;
+}

again, cb2 is not freed.
[...]

yep, done


+static inline u64 get_swqe_addr(u64 tmp_addr, int addr_seg)
+{
+ u64 addr;
+ addr = tmp_addr;
+ return addr;
+}

This is suppsed to change in the future? If not you can get rid of it.

+
+static inline u64 get_rwqe_addr(u64 tmp_addr)
+{
+ return tmp_addr;
+}

same here.

removed


+ ehea_poll()

The poll function seems too long and therefore hard to review. Please consider splitting it.



done

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/