Re: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:00 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Make it possible to disable the block layer.  Not all embedded devices require
> it, some can make do with just JFFS2, NFS, ramfs, etc - none of which require
> the block layer to be present.
> 
> This patch does the following:
> 
>  (*) Introduces CONFIG_BLOCK to disable the block layer, buffering and blockdev
>      support.

Excellent -- I've been meaning to do this (and occasionally hacking on
it half-heartedly before getting distracted by something else shiny) for
a _long_ time.

It looks good in general.

>  (*) The contents of a number of filesystem- and blockdev-specific header files
>      are now contingent on their own configuration options.  This includes:
>      Ext3/JBD, RAID, MSDOS and ReiserFS.

Why? Those header files shouldn't be included from anywhere _but_ the
code in question, and in fact should probably be just moved into fs/foo
instead of living in include/linux/foo_fs.h. 

And please, _never_ make anything dependent on CONFIG_foo_MODULE.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/