Re: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:53:02 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > >
> > > rcutorture fix patches independent of rcu implementation changes
> > > in this patchset.
> > 
> > So this patchset is largely orthogonal to the presently-queued stuff?
> 
> Yes, it should be.

OK.

> > > > Now what?
> > > 
> > > Heh. I can always re-submit against -mm after I wait for a day or two
> > > for comments :)
> > 
> > That would be good, thanks.  We were seriously considering merging all the
> > SRCU stuff for 2.6.18, because
> 
> I think non-srcu rcutorture patches can be merged in 2.6.19. srcu
> is a tossup. Perhaps srcu and this patchset may be merge candidates
> for 2.6.20 should things go well in review and testing.

Oh.  I was planning on merging *rcu* into 2.6.19-rc1.

> Should I re-submit
> against 2.6.18-mm1 or so (after your patchset reduces in size) ?
> What is a convenient time ?

Any time..

> GAh! cpufreq.

heh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/