Re: A nice CPU resource controller

[Mike Galbraith]

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:

> But your implication here is valid.  It is better to fiddle with the 
> dynamic priorities than with nice as this leaves nice for its primary 
> purpose of enabling the sysadmin to effect the allocation of CPU 
> resources based on external considerations.

I don't understand.  It _is_ the administrator fiddling with nice based
on external considerations.  It just steadies the administrator's hand.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/