Re: prevent swsusp with PAE

[Pavel Machek]

On Thu 2006-08-31 15:48:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:35:21 +0200
> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > diff --git a/include/asm-i386/suspend.h b/include/asm-i386/suspend.h
> > > > index 08be1e5..01cd812 100644
> > > > --- a/include/asm-i386/suspend.h
> > > > +++ b/include/asm-i386/suspend.h
> > > > @@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ arch_prepare_suspend(void)
> > > >  		printk(KERN_ERR "PSE is required for swsusp.\n");
> > > >  		return -EPERM;
> > > >  	}
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
> > > > +	printk(KERN_ERR "swsusp is incompatible with PAE.\n");
> > > > +	/* This is actually instance of the same problem. We need
> > > > +	   identity mapping self-contained in swsusp_pg_dir, and PAE
> > > > +	   prevents that. Solution could be copied from x86_64. */
> > > > +	return -EPERM;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > 
> > > Why not do this in Kconfig??
> > 
> > Well, Kconfig does not provide natural place for comments, and
> > disappearing config option is sure to confuse people. But of course I
> > can do it.
> 
> It would be more conventional.

Well, I have very similar check few lines above, and this is both i386
specific, so I slightly prefer to do it in the code, but...

> I think what this really points at is a weakness in the menuconfig/xconfig/etc
> user interfaces.  It should be possible to navigate to the presently-disabled
> config option and ask it "why can't I turn you on?".

Yes, but I'll still have users asking me "why I can't turn it on" ;-).
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/