Re: tracepoint maintainance models

[Ingo Molnar]

* Karim Yaghmour <karim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> By no stretch of the english language did I insult you. [...]

let me point it out then:

>> That has been your own personal experience of such things. 
>> Fortunately by now you've provided to casual readers ample proof that 
>> such experience is but limited and therefore misleading.

you wrote this disputing a point of mine that Mathieu acknowledged 
meanwhile, and which you now acknowledge in this mail too:

> So, yes Ingo, you "wont be able to extract 'x' from the MARK(event, a) 
> markup" using just a "static" tracer. [...]

and as i wrote to Mathieu, this differene in markup can have performance 
impact on the code generated by gcc, so it can be of practical 
relevance. Unfortunately i dont have much influence on the fact that it 
takes so much time for you to understand and acknowledge such simple 
points: in this highly trivial case it was 3(!) mail exchanges =B-) 
Yuck! I should really heed others' advice that i should simply stop 
replying to you ... but i have to admit that often it's so tempting.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/