Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added usermemory)
From: Chandra Seetharaman
Date: Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:51:57 EST
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:49 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> >>Reserving in advance means that sometimes you won't be able to start a
> >>new group without taking back some of reserved pages. This is ... strange.
> >
> >
> > I do not see it strange. At the time of creation, user sees the failure
> > (that there isn't enough resource to provide the required/requested
> > guarantee) and can act accordingly.
> >
> > BTW, VMware does it this way.
> This is not true at least for ESX server.
Hmm, from what I have seen, in ESX server, creation of a VM will fail,
if the specified guarantees cannot meet at the time of creation.
> It overcommits memory and does dirty tricks like balooning to free memory then.
This is how they handle over commit, which is not what I was talking
about.
<snip>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/