Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added usermemory)

[Chandra Seetharaman]

On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:56 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:

<snip>

> The same for the limiting - either do not start new container, or
> recalculate limits to meet new requirements. You may not take care of
> guarantees as weel and create an overcommited configuration.
> 
> And one more thing. We've asked it many times and I ask it again -
> please, show us the other way for providing guarantee rather than
> limiting or reserving.

Why do we want the capability to be snipped at the infrastructure level.
Let the controller writers decide how they want to provide the
capability and the users to decide if they want to use the feature at a
price.

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx   |      .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/