Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:21:52PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:

> [...]  IOW, we should be able to do what Martin suggests fairly
> easily (if we agree on a 5-byte "null" jump at the entry of
> functions of interest). Right? [...]

My interpretation of Martin's Monday proposal is that, if implemented,
we wouldn't need any of this nop/int3 stuff.  If function being
instrumented were recompiled on-the-fly, then it could sport plain &
direct C-level calls to the instrumentation handlers.

- FChE

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature