Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

[Paul Menage]

On 9/21/06, Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can the generic container avoid performance bottlenecks due to locks
> or other hot cache lines on the main code paths for fork, exit, page
> allocation and task scheduling?

Page allocation and task scheduling are resource controller issues,
not generic process container issues. The generic process containers
would have essentially the same overheads for fork/exit that cpusets
have currently.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/