>OK. I would take care of it.
> Signed off by Om Narasimhan <om.turyx@xxxxxxxxx>
This is not the canonical format, per SubmittingPatches. It should be:
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
OK. I would resubmit.
> drivers/block/cciss.c | 4 +--
> drivers/block/cpqarray.c | 72 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> drivers/block/loop.c | 4 +--
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
Your diffstat should have indicated to you that this should be split up
better. Please (re-)read SubmittingPatches. *One* logical change per
patch, most importantly.
>Yes, but not the functionality.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c
> index 2cd3391..a800a69 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ #if 0 /* 'buf_size' member is 16-bits
> return -EINVAL;
> #endif
> if (iocommand.buf_size > 0) {
> - buff = kmalloc(iocommand.buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + buff = kzalloc(iocommand.buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (buff == NULL)
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> @@ -911,8 +911,6 @@ #endif
> kfree(buff);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> - } else {
> - memset(buff, 0, iocommand.buf_size);
> }
> if ((c = cmd_alloc(host, 0)) == NULL) {
> kfree(buff);
This changes performance potentially, no? The memset before was
conditional upon (iocommand.Request.Type.Direction == XFER_WRITE) and
now the memory will always be zero'd.