Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP

[Ludovic Drolez]

Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Maybe I was completely wrong with my assumption that one running process 
> always has an impact of 1, which would have make the scheduler underestimate 
> the load on one cpu and put too many processes on it, without moving them 
> afterward.

Yes, maybe that's the problem, since in my bench, one process takes only 40% of 
the CPU.

Cheers,

--
Ludovic DROLEZ                              Linbox / Free&ALter Soft
www.linbox.com www.linbox.org	              tel: +33 3 87 50 87 90
152 rue de Grigy - Technopole Metz 2000                   57070 METZ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/