Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Fri Sep 22 2006 - 10:26:08 EST


On Fri, 22 September 2006 15:17:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the
> AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also.

Good point. The other typo should be fairly obvious, though.

Jörn

--
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/