Re: [RFC] Initial alpha-0 for new page allocator API
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri Sep 22 2006 - 16:24:13 EST
Here is an iniitial patch of alloc_pages_range (untested, compiles).
Directed reclaim missing. Feedback wanted. There are some comments in the
patch where I am at the boundary of my knowledge and it would be good if
someone could supply the info needed.
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c 2006-09-22 15:10:42.246731179 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c 2006-09-22 15:11:10.449709078 -0500
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp)
{
void *ret;
+ unsigned long low = 0L;
+ unsigned long high = 0xffffffff;
struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = dev ? dev->dma_mem : NULL;
int order = get_order(size);
/* ignore region specifiers */
@@ -44,10 +46,14 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
return NULL;
}
- if (dev == NULL || (dev->coherent_dma_mask < 0xffffffff))
- gfp |= GFP_DMA;
+ if (dev == NULL)
+ /* Apply safe ISA LIMITS */
+ high = 16*1024*1024L;
+ else
+ if (dev->coherent_dma_mask < 0xffffffff)
+ high = dev->coherent_dma_mask;
- ret = (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, order);
+ ret = page_address(alloc_pages_range(low, high, gfp, order));
if (ret != NULL) {
memset(ret, 0, size);
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/include/linux/gfp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/include/linux/gfp.h 2006-09-22 15:10:42.235994626 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/include/linux/gfp.h 2006-09-22 15:11:10.462397735 -0500
@@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_pages_n
NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists + gfp_zone(gfp_mask));
}
+extern struct page *alloc_pages_range(unsigned long low, unsigned long high,
+ int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern struct page *alloc_pages_current(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order);
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-09-22 15:10:53.973976539 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-09-22 15:19:59.996440889 -0500
@@ -1195,9 +1195,119 @@ got_pg:
#endif
return page;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_pages);
+static struct page *rmqueue_range(unsigned long low, unsigned long high,
+ struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
+{
+ struct free_area * area;
+ unsigned int current_order;
+ struct page *page;
+
+ for (current_order = order; current_order < MAX_ORDER; ++current_order) {
+ area = zone->free_area + current_order;
+ if (list_empty(&area->free_list))
+ continue;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &area->free_list, lru) {
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
+
+ if (addr >= low ||
+ addr < high - (PAGE_SIZE << order))
+ goto found_match;
+ }
+ continue;
+found_match:
+ list_del(&page->lru);
+ rmv_page_order(page);
+ area->nr_free--;
+ zone->free_pages -= 1UL << order;
+ expand(zone, page, order, current_order, area);
+ return page;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+struct page *alloc_pages_range(unsigned long low, unsigned long high, int node,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, unsigned int order)
+{
+ const gfp_t wait = gfp_flags & __GFP_WAIT;
+ struct zonelist *zl;
+ struct zone **z;
+ struct page *page;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+ if (high < MAX_DMA_ADDRESS)
+ return alloc_pages(gfp_flags | __GFP_DMA, order);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
+ if (high < MAX_DMA32_ADDRESS)
+ return alloc_pages(gfp_flags | __GFP_DMA32, order);
+#endif
+ /*
+ * Is there an upper/lower limit of installed memory that we could
+ * check against instead of -1 ? The less memory installed the less
+ * the chance that we would have to do the expensive range search.
+ */
+ if (high == -1L && low == 0L)
+ return alloc_pages(gfp_flags, order);
+
+ if (node == -1)
+ node = numa_node_id();
+
+ /*
+ * Scan in the page allocator for memory.
+ * We skip all the niceties of the page allocator since this is
+ * used for device allocations that require memory from a limited
+ * address range.
+ */
+
+ might_sleep_if(wait);
+
+ zl = &NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[gfp_zone(gfp_flags)];
+
+ z = zl->zones;
+
+ if (unlikely(*z == NULL))
+ /* Should this ever happen?? */
+ return NULL;
+
+ do {
+ struct zone *zone = *z;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
+ page = rmqueue_range(low, high, zone, order);
+ spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
+ if (!page) {
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ put_cpu();
+ continue;
+ }
+ __count_zone_vm_events(PGALLOC, zone, 1 << order);
+ zone_statistics(zl, zone);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ put_cpu();
+
+ VM_BUG_ON(bad_range(zone, page));
+ if (!prep_new_page(page, order, gfp_flags))
+ goto got_pg;
+
+ } while (*(++z) != NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * For now just give up. In the future we need something like
+ * directed reclaim here.
+ */
+ page = NULL;
+got_pg:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER
+ if (page)
+ set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_flags);
+#endif
+ return page;
+}
+
/*
* Common helper functions.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/