Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

[Daniel Walker]

On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:20 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
> > > > 
> > > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
> > > 
> > > I bow to your incredible power of observation.  Now that you've shared
> > > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing
> > > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one?
> > 
> > Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm
> > not.
> 
> And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not
> that?

You mean the patch from Steven posted in May? Well it does appear to
silence the warning. You didn't like the approach it seems? Please tell
me why .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/