Re: [PATCH 21/21]: powerpc/cell spidernet DMA coalescing

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 03:46, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > 
> > The others look good, but this one complicates the code and doesn't have any benefit. Â20 
> > for 21 isn't bad.
> 
> Is the motivation for this change to improve performance by reducing the overhead
> of the mapping calls? ÂIf so, there may be some benefit for some systems. ÂCould
> you please elaborate?
> 

>From what I understand, this patch drastically reduces the number of
I/O PTEs that are needed in the iommu. With the current static IOMMU
mapping, it should only make a difference during initialization, but
any platform that uses a dynamic mapping of iommu entries will benefit
a lot from it, because:

- the card can do better prefetching of consecutive memory
- there are more I/O ptes available for other drivers.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/