Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

[Paul Jackson]

Dinakar wrote:
> IMO this change is counter intuitive and pointless

If we intend to make the cpuset to sched_domain interaction
functional, something like this was needed.

However I am now leaning toward thinking that the entire
effort to manipulate sched_domain definitions by cpusets
(the cpu_exclusive flag) has been counter intuitive, and
is borked.

So I will be sending out patches to remove it, and replace
with a trivial mechanism to allow for runtime manipulation
of the cpu_isolated_map.

Coming soon ...

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/