Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions

[Russell King]

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:19:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:07:22 +0100
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > Subject    : undefined reference to highest_possible_node_id
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/4/233
> > > >              http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/15/11
> > > > Submitter  : Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Caused-By  : Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >              commit 0f532f3861d2c4e5aa7dcd33fb18e9975eb28457
> > > > Status     : unknown
> > > 
> > > Looking at this commit and the mails, it was known on the 4th September
> > > that this patch caused build errors while this change was in -mm, yet it
> > > still found its way into mainline on 2nd October.
> > > 
> > > Is anyone going to look at fixing this problem, or should we be asking
> > > for the commit to be reverted?
> > 
> > Since everyone seems intent at ignoring this issue, here's a patch to
> > try to solve it.
> 
> I sent the below to Linus yesterday...

Ah, okay.  Must not have poped out of the other side of Linus by 6am GMT
then.  (We also seem to have non-working git snapshots again, so when I
looked at the ARM kautobuild it showed the same old errors.)

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/