[PATCH 58/61] tcp: cubic scaling error

From: Chris Wright
Date: Wed Nov 01 2006 - 00:49:08 EST


-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>

Doug Leith observed a discrepancy between the version of CUBIC described
in the papers and the version in 2.6.18. A math error related to scaling
causes Cubic to grow too slowly.

Patch is from "Sangtae Ha" <sha2@xxxxxxxx>. I validated that
it does fix the problems.

See the following to show behavior over 500ms 100 Mbit link.

Sender (2.6.19-rc3) --- Bridge (2.6.18-rt7) ------- Receiver (2.6.19-rc3)
1G [netem] 100M

http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc3/cubic-orig.png
http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc3/cubic-fix.png

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.18.1.orig/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
+++ linux-2.6.18.1/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static inline void bictcp_update(struct
*/

/* change the unit from HZ to bictcp_HZ */
- t = ((tcp_time_stamp + ca->delay_min - ca->epoch_start)
+ t = ((tcp_time_stamp + (ca->delay_min>>3) - ca->epoch_start)
<< BICTCP_HZ) / HZ;

if (t < ca->bic_K) /* t - K */
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static inline void measure_delay(struct
(s32)(tcp_time_stamp - ca->epoch_start) < HZ)
return;

- delay = tcp_time_stamp - tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsecr;
+ delay = (tcp_time_stamp - tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsecr)<<3;
if (delay == 0)
delay = 1;

@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static int __init cubictcp_register(void

beta_scale = 8*(BICTCP_BETA_SCALE+beta)/ 3 / (BICTCP_BETA_SCALE - beta);

- cube_rtt_scale = (bic_scale << 3) / 10; /* 1024*c/rtt */
+ cube_rtt_scale = (bic_scale * 10); /* 1024*c/rtt */

/* calculate the "K" for (wmax-cwnd) = c/rtt * K^3
* so K = cubic_root( (wmax-cwnd)*rtt/c )

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/