Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Paul Jackson wrote:

> David wrote:
> >  - While the process containers are only single-level, the controllers are
> >    _inherently_ hierarchial just like a filesystem.  So it appears that
> 
> Cpusets certainly enjoys what I would call hierarchical process
> containers.  I can't tell if your flat container space is just
> a "for instance", or you're recommending we only have a flat
> container space.
> 

This was using the recommendation of "each process belongs to a single 
container that can be attached to controller nodes later."  So while it is 
indeed possible for the controllers, whatever they are, to be hierarchical 
(and most assuredly should be), what is the objection against grouping 
processes in single-level containers?  The only difference is that now 
when we assign processes to specific controllers with their attributes set 
as we desire, we are assigning a container (or group) processes instead of 
individual ones.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/