Re: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD

[Eric Dumazet]

Rusty Russell a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:09 -0800, akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Apparently FUTEX_FD is unfixably racy and nothing uses it (or if it does, it
> > shouldn't).
> >
> > Add a warning printk, give any remaining users six months to migrate off it.
>
> This makes sense.  FUTEX_FD was for the NGPT project which did userspace
> threading, and hence couldn't block.  It was always kind of a hack
> (although unfixably racy isn't quite right, it depends on usage).
>
> However, the existence of FUTEX_FD is what made Ingo complain that we
> couldn't simply pin the futex page in memory, because now a process
> could pin one page per fd.  Removing it would seem to indicate that we
> can return to a much simpler scheme of (1) pinning a page when someone
> does futex_wait, and (2) simply comparing futexes by physical address.
>
> Now, I realize with some dismay that simplicity is no longer a futex
> feature, but it might be worth considering?

Hum... I am not sure playing MM games is good... really...

This discussion reminds me I posted a patch some time ago that got no comments 
from the community.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/9/26

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/